Asesmen Computational Thinking di Pendidikan Matematika: Analisis Bibliometrik Menggunakan Vosviewer
Abstrak
Computational Thinking (CT) is a thinking skill that is needed in mathematics education. CT-based mathematics education can train students to develop problem solving, analyze data, perform modeling, and train algorithmic thinking skills. This study aims to describe the visualization of bibliometric network mapping between keywords in CT assessment research in mathematics education and find recommendations for CT assessment topics in mathematics education that provide opportunities for future research. This type of research uses descriptive research with a bibliometric approach. The data collection technique used secondary data from the Scopus database. The data analysis technique uses bibliometric analysis with the help of VOSviewer software. The results of bibliometric analysis using VOSviewer found in the visualization network there are 5 cluster themes. While in the results of overlay visualization and density visualization, CT research shows that for the topics of assessment, instrument, mathematics, education there has not been much research done so there are opportunities for research by taking or collaborating these topics.
Referensi
Aminah, N., Maat, S. M., & Sudarsono. (2023). Computational thinking of prospective mathematics teacher viewed from entrepreneur character. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 12(2), 267–278.
Angeli, C., & Giannakos, M. (2020). Computational thinking education: Issues and challenges. Computers in Human Behavior, 105, 106185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.106185
Chahyadi, F., Bettiza, M., Ritha, N., Radzi Rathomi, M., & Hayaty, N. (2021). Peningkatan high order thinking skill siswa melalui pendampingan computational thinking. Jurnal Anugerah, 3(1), 25–36. https://doi.org/10.31629/anugerah.v3i1.3344
Clarke-Midura, J., Silvis, D., Shumway, J. F., Lee, V. R., & Kozlowski, J. S. (2021). Developing a kindergarten computational thinking assessment using evidence-centered design: The case of algorithmic thinking. Computer Science Education, 31(2), 117–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2021.1877988
Dong, Y., Cateté, V., Jocius, R., Lytle, N., Barnes, T., Albert, J., Joshi, D., Robinson, R., & Andrews, A. (2019). Prada: A practical model for integrating computational thinking in K-12 education. SIGCSE ’19, 906–912. https://doi.org/10.1145/3287324.3287431
Finandhita, A., Mega, R. U., Jumansyah, R., Rafdhi, A. A., & Oktafiani, D. (2022). VOSviewer Application analysis: Computational physical chemistry case study. Moroccan Journal of Chemistry, 10(1), 91–101. https://doi.org/10.48317/IMIST.PRSM/morjchem-v10i1.31756
Ginting, S. L. B. (2023). A Computational Bibliometric Analysis of esport management using VOSviewer. International Journal of Informatics , Information System and Computer Engineering, 4(1), 31–48.
Habibi, F., Fitriana, A., & Sulityowati, E. (2022). Pemetaan bibliometrik terhadap perkembangan penelitian e-learning pada Google Scholar menggunakan VOSviewer. Attractive: Innovative Education Journal, 4(2), 383–395.
Hanifah, S., Abdillah, T. D. F., & Wachyudi, K. (2022). Analisis bibliometrik dalam mencari research gap menggunakan aplikasi VOSviewer dan aplikasi Publish or Perish. Journal of Innovation Research and Knowledge, 2(7), 2713–2728. https://bajangjournal.com/index.php/JIRK/article/view/4082
Haryandi, S., Suyidno, S., Misbah, M., Dewantara, D., Mahtari, S., & Ibrahim, M. A. (2021). Scientific creativity: A bibliometric review and analysis. Momentum: Physics Education Journal, 5(1), 10–20. https://doi.org/10.21067/mpej.v5i1.5002
Karim, A., Soebagyo, J., Nuranti, R. P., & Uljanah, A. L. (2022). Analisis bibliometrik menggunakan VOSviewer terhadap trend riset matematika terapan di Google Scholar. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika Jakarta, 3(2), 23–33. https://doi.org/10.21009/jrpmj.v3i2.22264
Li, Y., Schoenfeld, A. H., DiSessa, A. A., Graesser, A. C., Benson, L. C., English, L. D., & Duschl, R. A. (2020). Computational thinking is more about thinking than computing. Journal for STEM Education Research, 3, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41979-020-00030-2
Puspitasari, L., Taukhit, I., & Setyarini, M. (2022). Integrasi computational thinking dalam pembelajaran matematika di era society 5.0. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Matematika IV, 4(1), 373–380. https://proceeding.unikal.ac.id/index.php/sandika/article/view/1220
Relkin, E., de Ruiter, L. E., & Bers, M. U. (2021). Learning to code and the acquisition of computational thinking by young children. Computers and Education, 169, 104222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104222
Sampurna, A., Prasetia, M. R., & Eka S, A. A. (2022). Problem solving in mathematics learning in the context of computational thinking skills. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Matematika (SNPM) IV, 64–79.
Setyaningsih, I., Indarti, N., & Jie, F. (2018). Bibliometric analysis of the term “green manufacturing.” International Journal of Management Concepts and Philosophy, 11(3), 315–339. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijmcp.2018.093500
Supiarmo, M. G., Mardhiyatirrahmah, L., & Turmudi, T. (2021). Pemberian scaffolding untuk memperbaiki proses berpikir komputasional siswa dalam memecahkan masalah matematika. Jurnal Cendekia : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 5(1), 368–382. https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v5i1.516
Tucker-Raymond, E., Cassidy, M., & Puttick, G. (2021). Science teachers can teach computational thinking through distributed expertise. Computers and Education, 173, 104284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104284
Wardani, S. S., Susanti, R. D., & Taufik, M. (2022). Implementasi pendekatan computational thinking melalui game jungle adventure terhadap kemampuan problem solving. SJME (Supremum Journal of Mathematics Education), 6(`1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.35706/sjme.v6i1.5430
Wei, X., Lin, L., Meng, N., Tan, W., Kong, S. C., & Kinshuk. (2020). The effectiveness of partial pair programming on elementary school students’ computational thinking skills and self-efficacy. Computers and Education, 104023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104023
Yuntawati, Y., Sanapiah, S., & Aziz, L. A. (2021). Analisis Kemampuan computational thinking mahasiswa dalam menyelesaikan masalah matematika. Jurnal Media Pendidikan Matematika, 9(1), 34–42. https://doi.org/10.33394/mpm.v9i1.3898
Angeli, C., & Giannakos, M. (2020). Computational thinking education: Issues and challenges. Computers in Human Behavior, 105, 106185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.106185
Chahyadi, F., Bettiza, M., Ritha, N., Radzi Rathomi, M., & Hayaty, N. (2021). Peningkatan high order thinking skill siswa melalui pendampingan computational thinking. Jurnal Anugerah, 3(1), 25–36. https://doi.org/10.31629/anugerah.v3i1.3344
Clarke-Midura, J., Silvis, D., Shumway, J. F., Lee, V. R., & Kozlowski, J. S. (2021). Developing a kindergarten computational thinking assessment using evidence-centered design: The case of algorithmic thinking. Computer Science Education, 31(2), 117–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2021.1877988
Dong, Y., Cateté, V., Jocius, R., Lytle, N., Barnes, T., Albert, J., Joshi, D., Robinson, R., & Andrews, A. (2019). Prada: A practical model for integrating computational thinking in K-12 education. SIGCSE ’19, 906–912. https://doi.org/10.1145/3287324.3287431
Finandhita, A., Mega, R. U., Jumansyah, R., Rafdhi, A. A., & Oktafiani, D. (2022). VOSviewer Application analysis: Computational physical chemistry case study. Moroccan Journal of Chemistry, 10(1), 91–101. https://doi.org/10.48317/IMIST.PRSM/morjchem-v10i1.31756
Ginting, S. L. B. (2023). A Computational Bibliometric Analysis of esport management using VOSviewer. International Journal of Informatics , Information System and Computer Engineering, 4(1), 31–48.
Habibi, F., Fitriana, A., & Sulityowati, E. (2022). Pemetaan bibliometrik terhadap perkembangan penelitian e-learning pada Google Scholar menggunakan VOSviewer. Attractive: Innovative Education Journal, 4(2), 383–395.
Hanifah, S., Abdillah, T. D. F., & Wachyudi, K. (2022). Analisis bibliometrik dalam mencari research gap menggunakan aplikasi VOSviewer dan aplikasi Publish or Perish. Journal of Innovation Research and Knowledge, 2(7), 2713–2728. https://bajangjournal.com/index.php/JIRK/article/view/4082
Haryandi, S., Suyidno, S., Misbah, M., Dewantara, D., Mahtari, S., & Ibrahim, M. A. (2021). Scientific creativity: A bibliometric review and analysis. Momentum: Physics Education Journal, 5(1), 10–20. https://doi.org/10.21067/mpej.v5i1.5002
Karim, A., Soebagyo, J., Nuranti, R. P., & Uljanah, A. L. (2022). Analisis bibliometrik menggunakan VOSviewer terhadap trend riset matematika terapan di Google Scholar. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika Jakarta, 3(2), 23–33. https://doi.org/10.21009/jrpmj.v3i2.22264
Li, Y., Schoenfeld, A. H., DiSessa, A. A., Graesser, A. C., Benson, L. C., English, L. D., & Duschl, R. A. (2020). Computational thinking is more about thinking than computing. Journal for STEM Education Research, 3, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41979-020-00030-2
Puspitasari, L., Taukhit, I., & Setyarini, M. (2022). Integrasi computational thinking dalam pembelajaran matematika di era society 5.0. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Matematika IV, 4(1), 373–380. https://proceeding.unikal.ac.id/index.php/sandika/article/view/1220
Relkin, E., de Ruiter, L. E., & Bers, M. U. (2021). Learning to code and the acquisition of computational thinking by young children. Computers and Education, 169, 104222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104222
Sampurna, A., Prasetia, M. R., & Eka S, A. A. (2022). Problem solving in mathematics learning in the context of computational thinking skills. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Matematika (SNPM) IV, 64–79.
Setyaningsih, I., Indarti, N., & Jie, F. (2018). Bibliometric analysis of the term “green manufacturing.” International Journal of Management Concepts and Philosophy, 11(3), 315–339. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijmcp.2018.093500
Supiarmo, M. G., Mardhiyatirrahmah, L., & Turmudi, T. (2021). Pemberian scaffolding untuk memperbaiki proses berpikir komputasional siswa dalam memecahkan masalah matematika. Jurnal Cendekia : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 5(1), 368–382. https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v5i1.516
Tucker-Raymond, E., Cassidy, M., & Puttick, G. (2021). Science teachers can teach computational thinking through distributed expertise. Computers and Education, 173, 104284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104284
Wardani, S. S., Susanti, R. D., & Taufik, M. (2022). Implementasi pendekatan computational thinking melalui game jungle adventure terhadap kemampuan problem solving. SJME (Supremum Journal of Mathematics Education), 6(`1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.35706/sjme.v6i1.5430
Wei, X., Lin, L., Meng, N., Tan, W., Kong, S. C., & Kinshuk. (2020). The effectiveness of partial pair programming on elementary school students’ computational thinking skills and self-efficacy. Computers and Education, 104023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104023
Yuntawati, Y., Sanapiah, S., & Aziz, L. A. (2021). Analisis Kemampuan computational thinking mahasiswa dalam menyelesaikan masalah matematika. Jurnal Media Pendidikan Matematika, 9(1), 34–42. https://doi.org/10.33394/mpm.v9i1.3898
