Presentation
Does the paper present a cohesive argument? Are the ideas presented clearly?

Writing
Does the title appropriately characterize the manuscript? Is the writing concise and easy to follow?

Length
Which portions of the paper should be expanded? Removed? Condensed? Summarized? Combined?

Title
Is the title concise, omitting terms that are implicit and, where possible, stating the main result or conclusion presented in the manuscript? Abbreviations should be avoided within the title.

Abstract
Does the abstract consist of: 1) the objective of the community service; 2) the method; 3) the results or findings; and 4) the conclusions?

Introduction
Clearly and respectively describing:
The background of the community service;
The state of the art, relevant community service initiatives to justify the novelty of the manuscript;
Gap analysis and novelty statement;
Problem statement (optional);
The approach to solving the problem; and
The objective of the community service.

Method
The method is written clearly.
It not only describes the definition of terms but also explains how the community service was conducted.
It describes the location, participants, instruments, and data analysis.

Results and Discussion
The data presented has been processed (not raw data) into tables or figures and accompanied by supportive descriptions that are easy to follow.
The results of the community service relate to the initial questions or objectives outlined in the Introduction section.
The author describes the results of the community service, noting consistency with or differences from what has been reported by other practitioners.
The author provides a scientific interpretation for each of the results or findings presented.
The author describes the implications of the community service.

Conclusion

Consists of:
Addressing the objectives of the community service;
Written in paragraph form, not in bullet points or numbering.